A direct injection of RM1,500 for every Malaysian is needed to claw back some of the losses
pic by MUHD AMIN NAHARUL
MAKING forecasts in the middle of an unfolding economic crisis is always difficult, but unfortunately, the pessimistic forecasts we made in June — when we predicted that the economy would contract by 7.1% due to the Covid-19 pandemic — are proving right.
The market consensus is now catching up to what we had predicted some months ago. In August, Bank Negara Malaysia revised down its forecast for GDP in 2020 to between -3.5% and -5.5%. The Asian Development Bank revised its estimate down from -4% to -5% in September and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised its 2020 growth forecast down from -3.8% to -6% in October.
Private sector forecasters are also heading towards a range of -6% to -7% as the true scale of the economic crisis has unfolded.
We also predicted a second wave of economic costs and we are seeing that now, not just in Malaysia, but also around the world in Malaysia’s main export markets. Added to this, the uncertainty of the US election and the political instability here in Malaysia itself are creating a maelstrom of uncertainty within an already terrible economic situation.
Fortunately, some of our policy recommendations have been followed. There has been a 25-basis-point cut in the Overnight Policy Rate (OPR) in September to 1.75%, but real interest rates still remain high at around 3%.
An extra cash injection of RM10 billion was announced in September, but the full effect of the RM305 billion packages from the Prihatin and Penjana stimulus packages is difficult to gauge because the Laksana reports show that the non-cash incentives may not be as effective as had been hoped because of low take-up or caution among consumers and businesses.
Based on the evolution of events, we maintain our previous forecast from June that the economy will contract by around 7% by the end of 2020. We have downgraded our best-case forecast to a 6% contraction based on the current scenario, which is worse than the 4.3% contraction we forecast in June.
This downgrade in the best-case scenario mainly reflects the deterioration in the Covid-19 situation and the impact of that on the two main components of domestic demand. Consumption has been heavily affected by lower disposable income due to the reduction of workers in productive employment. Investment has suffered from lower spending by firms and we expect overall investment to contract by 21% by the end of the year.
The effects of the downturn mean that the previous level of GDP at the end of 2019 will not be reached again until the second half of 2021 and overall GDP will be about 8% below where it would have been without Covid-19. In technical terms, this is more like an “L-shaped” contraction, with any hope of a “V-shaped” recession all but over.
On a more positive note, we have raised our forecast for economic growth in 2021 from 3.8% to 6%, but this will be weak growth, largely dependent on an improvement in the international economy and a technical “dead-cat” bounce in the domestic economy.
This more optimistic outcome is also dependant on there being no further deterioration in the Covid-19 pandemic and a stable outcome of political uncertainties domestically and internationally.
We must also remember the longterm impact on the Malaysian economy from the decline in investment, the impact on human capital development due to the disruption of education and the hollowing-out of many sectors due to the closure of firms that will never reopen. This is likely to cause mass under-employment, disguised by the official unemployment figures. We predict that around two million Malaysians will be unemployed or under-employed this year as a consequence of the Covid-19 crisis.
These factors will damage the long-term growth potential of the economy and harm economic competitiveness. We expect that growth in 2022 and successive years will be under 4% per year on average due to the reduced growth potential caused by the Covid-19 crisis.
In terms of inflation and prices, we expect that the risk of deflation will extend into 2021, nonetheless, we have revised our forecast for headline inflation for 2020 upward to -1.5% and we forecast 1% inflation in 2021. Given this deflationary environment, we maintain our target of 1.5% for the OPR to help stimulate the economy at a time when inflation is not a worry.
Against this backdrop, it is clear that the government’s response in the budget tomorrow is crucial if we are to avoid economic contraction into next year and beyond.
We believe that the budget should not focus on a “wish-list” of spending, such as the 6,600 suggestions announced by the Finance Minister earlier this week. This is bad policy and mainly helps vested interests. It is also much too slow and will not trickle down directly into the marketplace where it is needed immediately.
Instead, it is clear that we need an immediate and direct cash injection into the wallets of ordinary Malaysians, to be spent quickly and as they choose — on the urgent priorities that are affecting their lives now.
We had previously calculated that an extra RM50 billion is necessary immediately. This is roughly equivalent to RM1,500 for every man, woman and child in Malaysia and is needed urgently, to offset the decline in consumption and to offer some much needed demand for firms struggling with the absence of customers.
This is also the best way for the government to create a “budget for jobs”. It is not the job of the government to create artificial jobs — it is the job of the government to create the environment for real jobs to flourish.
Demand-side support for short-term recovery and to protect existing real jobs should be prioritised over job-creation or training schemes. Supply-side reform to promote long-term growth, which we expect to decline due to this crisis just as it did after the 2008 crisis, will be necessary too — but not in this budget.
Debt stabilisation and monetisation of debt is also an option to inject cash into the economy and we would like to see a further easing of monetary policy through the monetisation of debt, perhaps beginning with the PTPTN (National Higher Education Fund Corp) debt portfolio. This will reduce the burden of debt overall and there may not be a better time for the government to take this bold opportunity.
Dr Paolo Casadio, Dr Hui Hon Chung & Dr Geoffrey Williams
HELP University, Kuala Lumpur
The views expressed are of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the stand of the newspaper’s owners and editorial board.