by BLOOMBERG/ pic by BLOOMBERG
NEW YORK • First, WeWork hit London. Then, Boston. Then, Toronto.
Over the past six days, WeWork executives have raced from city to city in an attempt to win over increasingly sceptical investors.
But by the time the company’s Gulfstream G-6 touched down outside New York late Tuesday night, the grandiose ambitions of Adam Neumann (picture), the company’s brash co-founder and pitchman, remained poised on a knife’s edge.
His own fortune, while still enviable, was rapidly slipping away. With WeWork’s valuation plummeting, anxiety is growing about when, how or even whether the hipster office-rental company should go public, with even its own bankers unnerved.
In question, too, is where this now leaves other fast-growing, money- burning companies — the so-called unicorns.
Rarely has the view from the corner office been so at odds with the view from the marketplace. WeWork’s predicament has exposed the yawning gap between what private investors think a young company might be worth and what that company might actually fetch in the stock market.
Neumann, who over the years helped WeWork raise more than US$12 billion (RM49 billion) while never turning a dime of profit, is said to be pressing ahead with plans for an initial public offering (IPO) while simultaneously hunting for still more private capital.
At the same time, WeWork is considering changing various corporate governance practices, according to people with knowledge of the situation.
Neumann’s Voting Control
Both of its lead financial advisors — JPMorgan Chase & Co and Goldman Sachs Group Inc — have concerns about proceeding with an IPO that could value the company as low as US$15 billion, the people said, asking not to be identified because the talks are confidential.
That’s set off a push to make the public sale more palatable to potential investors with governance reforms.
Any decision ultimately rests with Neumann, who maintains voting control through a three-class share structure and has been an adamant proponent of the IPO, the people said.
He also has been criticised for borrowing the firm’s money, leasing properties he owns back to the company and selling chunks of equity ahead of the planned IPO. The firm rents space in four buildings owned by Neumann, according to the prospectus.
It signed a lease on three of them the day he obtained his stake, and committed to being a tenant in them within the next year.
Until recently, Neumann was poised to become one of the world’s richest entrepreneurs.
Earlier this year, more than a decade after he launched WeWork, some bankers were privately touting a valuation as high as US$65 billion.
That would have pegged Neumann’s current 22% stake at US$14 billion, catapulting him into the ranks of the world’s 150 richest people.
Now, based on more recent valuations, Neumann’s stake might be worth as little as US$3 billion — not enough for a listing in the 500-member Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
The stakes are even higher for SoftBank Group Corp, WeWork’s largest investor, which added to its stake in January at a US$47 billion valuation.
WeWork needs to raise at least US$3 billion through an IPO to tap into an additional US$6 billion credit line that bankers have been setting up in recent weeks.
The facility requires the company to carry out its offering by Dec 31, one of the people said.
The goal is to conclude a roadshow and price the offering before Rosh Hashana, one of the people said, effectively setting a deadline of Sept 27.
Getting it done beforehand would allow Neumann, 40, to avoid using technology and observe the holiday in compliance with Jewish orthodoxy.
It’s unclear what changes WeWork may make to its governance to improve interest in its IPO. The company already has taken some steps, such as adding a woman to its board and
having Neumann return US$5.9 million of partnership interests initially granted to him as compensation for trademarks used in a rebranding.
Yet, its prospectus last month raised a variety of other concerns. Among them: The company paid Neumann rent and lent him money.
There’s also his voting rights over major decisions. A spokesman for WeWork declined to comment.
WeWork, which owns or leases offices and then rents space to companies that typically have shorter-term needs, released a preliminary prospectus last month showing the firm had racked up billions in losses and was burning cash. It lost US$690 million in this year’s first half, bringing total losses to almost US$3 billion in the past three years.
The company had planned to hold a formal roadshow to promote the offering as soon as this week.
Early this year, Goldman Sachs privately suggested to people close to WeWork that its valuation could rise to US$65 billion after going public.
Advisors estimate it may achieve less than a third of that under current conditions.
Meanwhile, SoftBank’s hefty investment in WeWork adds to pressure on Wall Street dealmakers to ensure any public offering doesn’t go awry.
SoftBank’s Vision Fund owns stakes in a vast array of technology ventures, giving the firm clout in deciding which investment banks are hired for future fundraisings.
It has pressed WeWork to postpone the stock offering, according to people with knowledge of the talks.
The Vision Fund invested in WeWork at about a US$20 billion valuation in early 2017, while SoftBank Group kept pouring in money. A weak IPO could hurt the value of the fund’s stake just as SoftBank tries to persuade customers to bankroll a second US$108 billion iteration of the investment vehicle.