US and UK Uber drivers threaten protests, but RM37.4b IPO rides on

There’s no easy way to satisfy calls for higher wages and demands that Uber eventually make money as well


SAN FRANCISCO • Simmering tensions between drivers and ride-hailing companies are flaring again, as drivers in major cities across the US and the UK threatened strikes yesterday over low wages and unstable working conditions.

Billed as an international protest in advance of Uber Technologies Inc’s planned initial public offering (IPO) this week, drivers in London and nearby cities said they turned off their apps at 7am yesterday.

In the US, driver groups in Boston, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and other large cities previously said they would participate in the strike and encouraged users to boycott the apps as well.

There was little initial evidence of a lack of drivers in London, one of Uber’s largest markets, with the app showing numerous rides available around the capital’s financial district.

However, the threat of protests captured the attention of local politicians, with UK Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn tweeting that “Uber cannot be allowed to get away with huge payouts for their CEOs, while refusing to pay drivers a decent wage and respect their rights at work”.

At issue are long-standing disputes between the ride-hailing companies and professional drivers, who said the platforms have made it difficult to make a living in the industry.

Demands from the New York Taxi Workers Alliance — which largely echoed other groups — included boosting job stability by ending “unfair deactivations”, raising driver pay and increasing regulation of fares, while guaranteeing drivers a larger cut.

Some organisers also called for drivers to be classified as employees, a move that would have profound implications for the ride-hailing business model, if enacted by governments.

The protests will be familiar to anyone who was following Lyft Inc’s IPO, which valued the business at US$25 billion in March.

As the company pitched itself to investors, protesters attempted to picket the company’s roadshow, and drivers went on strike in San Diego and Los Angeles. But the spectacle around Uber is expected to be even bigger.

The company, which is expected to begin trading on the New York Stock Exchange tomorrow, has demand to sell as much as US$9 billion (RM37.35 billion) worth of stock in a deal that would value the business at US$84 billion. It’s likely to be one of the 10 largest IPOs of all time in the US.

Gestures of goodwill by Lyft and Uber to offer IPO stock to their most loyal drivers haven’t eased tensions.

The deals rankled drivers groups, which accused the companies of profiting off drivers’ misfortune.

In a statement, UK organiser Yaseen Aslam said Uber’s IPO would amount to an “unprecedented international orgy of greed as investors cash in on one of the most abusive business models ever to emerge from Silicon Valley”.

Uber said in a statement on Tuesday that “drivers are at the heart of our service — we can’t succeed without them”.

The company also said it will “continue working to improve the experience for and with drivers” and that those efforts could include moving toward “more consistent earnings, stronger insurance protections or fully-funded fouryear degrees for drivers or their families”.

But there appears to be no easy way to satisfy both drivers’ calls for higher wages, and investors’ demands that Uber eventually make money.

The company had an operating loss of about US$3 billion last year, and its growth rate has slowed in recent quarters, indicating that margins may have to increase significantly for it to turn a profit.

In its IPO filing, Uber said it had paid US$837 million in “excess driver incentives” last year.

In the risk section of its filing, the company said: “As we aim to reduce driver incentives to improve our financial performance, we expect driver dissatisfaction will generally increase.”

Those profit goals — and the spectre of Uber increasing its cut of fares — have worried drivers who already feel undercut by ride-sharing platforms.

While the boycott in New York was meant to last only through the morning rush hour, drivers’ groups in Boston and Los Angeles encouraged members to turn off their apps for the full day. — Bloomberg