Given the order size at the sale, many investors expected Aramco would get away with lower yields than the govt
DUBAI • The slump in Saudi Arabian Oil Co (Aramco) bonds since its unprecedented debt sale this month makes one thing clear — you can’t take the Saudi out of Saudi Aramco.
Demand was so great, with bids topping US$100 billion (RM416 billion), that the energy giant managed to raise US$12 billion at lower yields than the kingdom itself, which is uncommon in corporate bond markets.
Investors are now paying the price for that discrepancy — all five maturities have fallen since trading started last week, in some cases by more than two cents on the dollar.
“We view the company as more of a Saudi risk, rather than just an energy company,” said Patrick Wacker, a fund manager at Singapore-based UOB Asset Management Ltd who dumped his holdings on the first day of trading to profit from the initial euphoria.
He predicts the debt will keep falling until it trades at a yield premium to the Saudi government. If he’s right, there’s still a ways to go before the Aramco bond sell-off is over.
The company’s US$3 billion notes due in 2029 yielded 3.77% as of 11:12am London time yesterday, less than the 3.87% on similar maturity Saudi government debt sold in January.
Given the order size at the sale, many investors expected the world’s biggest oil producer would get away with lower yields than the government and instead be compared to global peers such as London-based BP plc, whose notes due in 2028 yielded 3.45%.
That ’s not an unreasonable assumption. With US$111.1 billion of net income in 2018, Aramco ranks as the most profitable company in the world.
Even Moody’s Investors Service said this month it’s a contender for its top Aaa rating, yet “close interlinkages” with the sovereign prompted it to grade Aramco in line with the Saudi government, which is ranked four steps lower at A1.
“If it weren’t for its postcode, it would most likely have come even tighter,” Anders Faergemann, a fund manager in London at PineBridge Investments, which oversees about US$90 billion and owns Aramco bonds, said of the pricing.
“Aramco is a bit of special case as it stirred interest from all types of investors, not just your usual emerging- market (EM) investors.”
Aramco is integral to the economy of Saudi Arabia, which has been ramping up debt sales in recent years as falling oil prices left it with budget deficits.
The oil industry accounted for more than 60% of the kingdom’s revenue in 2017 and about half of Aramco’s board comprised government officials.
The money raised is also being used to finance Saudi Arabia’s economic agenda after the state postponed until at least 2021 plans to sell a stake in Aramco in an initial public offering.
Some investors who spoke to Bloomberg said a number of bondholders trimmed their positions because they had inflated the size of their initial orders to ensure they’d get a slice of the offering.
Others sold because their allocations were too small to make a difference to their portfolios, they said.
The 2,039 notes were trading at 96.92 cents on the dollar yesterday, compared to an issue price of 99.16 cents.
“We did not participate in the new deal as they priced inside the sovereign,” said Wouter Van Overfelt, a Zurich-based senior money manager at Vontobel Asset Management.
“While there may be good reasons for this to be the case, we would generally prefer the sovereign in such cases.”
Still, investors such as PineBridge in London and TCW Group Inc in Los Angeles said they are staying put, expecting volatility will eventually ease.
The bonds were particularly vulnerable to the recent sell-off in US Treasuries, but the long-term fundamentals of the company make it worth the risk, they said. The securities were little changed yesterday.
“Aramco’s new bonds seem to be a victim of the roadshow’s success,” said Brett Rowley, TCW’s MD for EMs.
“Our view on Aramco’s debt remains constructive. It’s a worldclass oil producer, which trades wide to international peers.”
Even so, Wacker at UOB Asset Management, which oversees about US$24 billion, said the price drop could leave a bitter taste with investors given all the initial hype.
“This may not have been the best way to start a capital-markets relationship with bond investors,” he said. — Bloomberg