Machines are coming for India’s unwanted factory jobs

By Anjani Trivedi / BLOOMBERG

A TEXTILE-YARN company in western Indian soon will have more machines than workers. A manufacturer in southern India sold almost double the number of its automated goods last year. India’s biggest carmaker has one robot for every four plant employees.

Automation will double over the next three years in Indian factories, according to a survey by Willis Towers Watson. Companies in the Asia-Pacific region reckon machines will account for 23% of work, on average, over the next three years, compared to 13% today.

In India, that figure is expected to rise to almost 30% from 14% over the same period.

India Inc is turning to machines quicker than its global peers. But unlike companies in Japan and Germany — which are automating to move up the food chain as their workers age — factories in the world’s second most populous country have a surprising motivation: They’re running out of willing (human) workers.

This is also happening as India’s ballooning working-age population needs more jobs. Over the next decade, 138 million people will be added to the workforce, a 30% rise, according to the McKinsey Global Institute.

Need a Job?
India’s youth unemployment rate (ages 15-24) is one of the highest among large, global economies.

The trouble is finding jobs that Indians actually want. The country’s workers would rather drive for food-delivery services on the breezy, albeit steamy, roads of Mumbai and work in hotels than in factories.

Fair enough. Who would want to work in a yarn mill, which needs to maintain a temperature of 33 ºC (91 ºF) and 60% relative humidity? Conditions on other industrial factory floors are likely worse.

That India’s yarn and cloth-making industries — among the most labour-intensive in the country — have become the vanguard of automation speaks to the challenge.

The textile-yarn company had to ramp up spending on hiring and venture deep into the Indian hinterland to find workers through recruitment camps, luring them with housing and attendance incentives.

It even has had to pay them just to return to work after the holiday season or weddings.

The rapid pace of automation has brought its own set of problems. The cost of adding machines is high, while labour costs are relatively lower.

Many of these companies wouldn’t break even for years by automating, and according to the Willis Towers Watson survey, few believe they are prepared to deal with the onset of machines.

The Indian government ’s job-guarantee programme, with its skewed incentives, hasn’t helped either.

For every worker that signs up for the 100-day plan, fewer will fuel the manufacturing sector and the “Make in India” programme.

Because wages for those jobs are, in several states, set below the minimum wage, anecdotally workers have been signing up at multiple job sites just to squeak by.

Other labourers have given up altogether. Take the city of Bengaluru, whose ready-made garment industry is composed mostly of young, unskilled migrant women. Studies have found that over a fifth of workers there don’t receive the minimum wage, and move from factory to factory only to end up in domestic-service work.

Who would’ve thought that India’s low- and unskilled workers, and the welfare programmes designed to help them, would drive companies toward automation?

In a country where manufacturing and construction each comprise 10% of the labour force — compared to 25% in services — these sectors should be driving India’s economy, not weighing it down.

The sad reality is that those in the bottom tiers of the labour force will be the most severely hurt by automation.

Can’t Make in India
India’s current labour force is mostly concentrated in agriculture and services.

Upgrading rusty manual machines isn’t a bad thing. The transition could help overall productivity, efficiency and quality.

Research also has found that automation often leads to other, better jobs.

The typewriter didn’t replace the stenographer completely, but taught people how to type instead.

The difference is that those workers had skills that could be upgraded. Meanwhile, only 18.5% of India’s labour force is skilled or holds an intermediate or advanced level of education, according to the United Nations Development Programme.

Manufacturing, as Prof Dr Dani Rodrik of Harvard University puts it, is “the quintessential escalator for developing economies”.

For India, which became a service- heavy economy before it fully industrialised, the consequences of automating the sector are far more dire.

The self-fulfilling cycle of India’s manufacturing void means workers may not be fully equipped to move up the ladder or out of the still-large informal economy.

Indian politicians have vowed to create millions of new jobs a year. That hasn’t happened.

Ahead of a big election, India’s accidental automation may make that promise even harder to fulfil.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its