The 2 nations clash on everything from car tariffs to basic economic philosophy
BEIJING • US President Donald Trump has sent his top economic advisors to China to discuss trade, a trip the president says has a “very good chance” of yielding a deal. But the two countries clash on everything from car tariffs to basic economic philosophy.
Here’s an overview of some of the big issues on which they disagree:
It’s often lost in the noise, but the trade row began as a dispute over technology.
Last year, Trump asked US Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Lighthizer to probe China’s treatment of US intellectual property (IP). In a 215- page report, USTR concluded China violates American IP in a variety of ways, prompting Trump to propose tariffs on up to US$150 billion (RM600 billion) of Chinese imports. A major source of friction is President Xi Jinping’s Made in China 2025 plan, which seeks to establish the nation as a global leader in everything from robotics to electric cars.
But Xi’s government has pledged to give foreign companies more access to its manufacturing sector, and it argues China has the right to use technology as a springboard for economic growth, just as other developing nations have done.
Even before Trump came to office, the US accused China of flooding the world with metals at prices below fair-market value. China was the prime target of global steel and aluminium targets imposed in March by Trump over US national security grounds. The world’s biggest steel producer churned out 832 million metric tonnes last year while consuming 737 million metric tonnes, according to the World Steel Association.
To put those figures in perspective, that gap is bigger than the combined steel output of Germany and France.
If China agrees with the US on anything, it’s that the Asian nation has a steel overcapacity problem — it has been cutting production and is aiming for further reductions over the next few years, and is imposing stricter rules on the industry.
The US argues that American companies don’t compete with their Chinese counterparts on a level playing field. China levies a 25% tariff on passenger cars, for example. The US collects a duty of 2.5% on imported cars. It’s also harder for American companies to invest in China.
While Trump’s proposed tariffs have gained most of the attention, the administration is also looking at ways to crack down on Chinese investment in the US in an effort to balance the scales and protect sensitive technology.
Despite still placing almost last among countries in a global ranking of openness to foreign direct investment, China believes it’s come a long way by developing-nation standards.
Xi promised a “new phase of opening up” last month, and officials then announced steps to open up the financial sector and auto tariff cuts.
US Trade Deficit
Trump has repeatedly complained about the trade deficit with China.
The gap in goods and services hit US$337 billion last year, accounting for more than half of America’s total shortfall. The president has asked Beijing to reduce the gap by US$100 billion.
The Chinese are fond of saying the deficit can be narrowed if the US eases restrictions on technology exports to China, and they point to the nature of the global supply chain:
China imports parts to assemble and ship to the US, which exaggerates the size of the trade gap.
China’s State-Driven Economy
Economists say the trade imbalance will remain unless there’s a change in the deeper dynamics of the two economies.
To close the gap, Americans would need to save more, while the Chinese would need to spend more.
But that may require a major shift in Beijing’s economic model, which has historically relied on exports and state-directed investment to drive growth. China has been gradually ramping up consumption and buying more foreign goods, but the US wants it to move faster.
The Trump administration last year rejected Beijing’s bid to have China classified as a “market economy”. The state’s pervasive role in markets creates “fundamental distortions” in China’s economy, the US has said.
In 2013, China said it would allow markets to play a key role in resource allocation. Still, Xi’s push for more dominant state-owned enterprises undermines that objective, and the ruling Communist Party’s grip on the state sector is getting tighter. Xi also has set himself up to rule indefinitely and has overseen sweeping government overhaul that gives the party greater control over everything from financial services to manufacturing to entertainment.
Trump promised during the 2016 election campaign to label China a currency manipulator. Since taking office, he has refrained from doing so. In its latest currency report, the Trump administration stepped up criticism of China’s lack of progress in rectifying the trade imbalance. Trump in April accused China, along with Russia, of gaming their currencies.
China does steer its currency — just not in the way the Trump has accused it of doing. The People’s Bank of China keeps the yuan within a daily trading band against the dollar. In 2015 and 2016, China burnt through some of its reserves to prop up the currency, not weaken it.