SGX’s handling of its drawn-out battle for survival is being closely followed by overseas investors
SINGAPORE • Noble Group Ltd’s dissident shareholder Goldilocks Investment Co Ltd said the Singapore regulator’s handling of the trader’s drawn-out battle for survival is being closely followed by overseas investors, highlighting the importance of the case for the city-state’s reputation as a financial hub.
“This was our first investment into Asia — we were looking at this as making an investment into Asia, especially in Singapore,” Ajit Vijay Joshi, a fund manager at Abu Dhabi-based Goldilocks, said in a phone interview.
He added: “I’m sure a lot of other people are watching what they will do.”
Once Asia’s largest commodity trader, Noble Group has imploded over the past three years, losing billions, defaulting on US$3.4 billion (RM13.29 billion) of debt, and shredding its market value.
That decline has been marked from the outset by allegations of improper accounting by long-time foe Iceberg Research, which the company has denied.
While Noble Group chairman Paul Brough is now pushing a debt-for-equity res- cue, Goldilocks is resisting, saying it’s unfair in its current form, and appealing to Singapore Exchange Ltd (SGX) to address its concerns.
“We’re closely watching how the whole regulatory regime responds to the minority shareholder rights,” Joshi said on Monday in his first media interview on the dispute. “I’m sure a lot of other people are looking at SGX’s response to some of the allegations that have been put forward.”
The Singapore exchange, the front-line regulator in the city-state, did not immediately provide a comment on Joshi’s remarks.
Earlier on Monday, an SGX spokesperson said the exchange remains in active engagement with Noble Group when asked about the fight between the company and Goldilocks.
An external spokesperson for Noble Group declined to comment yesterday, referencing past announcements to the SGX, including last week’s letter from the chairman setting out the case for the debt-for-equity rescue.
In that note, Brough said if shareholders don’t approve the plan, the company would opt for a pre-packaged administration in the UK to implement the restructuring.
“Our regulators need to rethink their strategy on when to intervene and investigate,” Associate Professor Mak Yuen Teen, co-director of the Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Centre at the National University of Singapore Business School, said by email yesterday.
“Not limited to this case, but there’s a sense that until something escalates to a huge public scandal, the regulators are quite content to stay on the sidelines.”
Goldilocks bought into Noble Group in mid-2017, and now has 8.1%, the largest holding after founder Richard Elman and China’s sovereign wealth fund.
Since then, Goldilocks’ relationship with Noble Group has soured as it objected to the rescue plan.
In March, it sued the company and its executives, alleging managers paid themselves inflated salaries and then attempted a cover-up. Noble Group has said the allegations are without merit.
While the fund has been battling the debt-for-equity proposal, more than 80% of senior creditors are in support, according to Noble Group.
The next key date comes next Monday, when the AGM is scheduled. A separate special meeting will be held for a shareholder vote on the rescue. Over the past 12 months, the shares have collapsed 93%.
Goldilocks said Brough’s plan will leave existing equity holders with too small a share of a new company. The latest row flared this week, when Noble Group rejected a submission from Goldilocks to nominate five directors, saying the paperwork was invalid. Goldilocks described the move as unprecedented.
Iceberg has also sought to draw the regulators into the fray. In August, the Monetary Authority of Singapore said it will investigate any potential breaches of the law flagged to it, responding to allegations from Iceberg that authorities failed to make adequate checks on the trader. — Bloomberg